I remember when I got my first dividend a year or so ago… I think it was for $36.–
Now, I just took a quick look at my investment summary, and apparently I’ve received $166.35 in dividends for 2007 and $70.06 for year-to-date 2008.
So.. not life-changing amounts. I don’t even notice them much because I automatically re-invest all my distributions, but – they are there, evidence that I am the OWNER of some tiny fraction of a company (or, since I invest in funds, very tiny parts of many, many companies), and when that company has PROFIT, as a shareholder I have CLAIM to some (again, tiny) part of its net income.
Saving is important, yes, but I’ve always saved. It’s only when I took the step towards investing that I found personal finance so much more fun (I spent the last several nights reading books on asset allocation).
Here’s the ad copy – clever, no?
_________________
*I am neither affliated with, nor do I endorse, Citigroup’s Women & Co. in any way. I am not a financial adviser – please do not rely on this blog for financial advice.
**The first thing I thought upon seeing the ad was – “wow – those cheekbones” and, “love the coat.”
You May Also Want To Read :
A reader emailed moi for advice on how to get started investing in a Roth IRA. I was pretty exci ...
My Freedom Fund = 10 months of no-income-living. By December, assuming all goes according to pl ...
If the economy wasn't so bad, I just might. Let me just say thank you for the parade of "oh n ...
{ 1 trackback }
{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }
Oh, look at that! They’re finally getting smart and marketing directly to us now!
I like the copy, but the first thing I thought when I saw that ad was BLAH. All gray, not happy. Not attention grabbing. Why is she wearing a huge coat? Yuck. Give me happy women with martinis or something.
But this ad is not targeted at me because dividends are not a girl’s best friend when she is in the 33% tax bracket.
Nice new banner, by the way!
Why are Asian spokespeople/actors used so much in financial advertisements? I notice because Asian-Americans are so under-represented in the music, television, and movie fields. Have you noticed this in your PF advertisement exposure?
I’m getting more into dividend stocks. They make me happy. I rarely look at growth stocks anymore. Income stocks are good that way, lots of dividends!
Out of curiousity, how did you get into dividend stocks?
@ Jaylin re: Asian models / spokespeople: My guess is for two reasons:
1) out of a desire to reach said populations by showing them reflected in their advertisements, and
2) because of the perception / stereotype in non-Asian communities that Asian people are smart with numbers and good with business.
Meadow
Dogatemyfinances-
Someone correct me on this, but I think the Bush tax cuts of several years ago set tax rates on dividends at 5% and 15%, so dividends should not be taxed at the rate of simple income.
…………………they are everybodies best freind…llloll…